Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane OCR: claim iapur S1983 Pet. App.. 18a -20a 22a- -23a The dis- trict court reasoned that beca use there is no constitutional right "finding" of probable cause there no S1983 action initiating prosecution without probable cause Pet. App 20a The district court found that bright "must point some other distinct constitutional deprivation te maintain' the S1983 action. Pet. App. 19a The district court also held that Detective Oliver was entitled defense oF qualified inimunity, Pet. App. 24a and that the complaint failed to allege facts sufficient 0 support municipal liability against the city of Macomb Pet App.. 24a 25a. 1r affirming, the court of appeals relied on Paul Davis, 424 U.S 693 (1976), to hold that prosecution with out probable cause constitutional tort actionable under $1983 only 11 accom ...
(.png)
